Data is much more qualitative in nature. In andat the invitation of Abraham Maslow and Clark Moustakas, two meetings were held in Detroit among psychologists who were interested in founding a professional association dedicated to a more meaningful, more humanistic vision. Sometimes the humanistic approach is called phenomenological.
This comparison is at the heart of decision-making when this approach is employed. Conclusion Instead of having a bias towards scientific or humanistic approaches to curriculum evaluation.
Furthermore, the results are compared in order to determine the level of success. The result of these scientific limitations produces little to no empirical evidence to support the key theories of humanistic approach McLeod.
The former is often related to questions of philosophy, existentialism, phenomenology and human emotions, while the latter takes science as its primary focus. The term "humanistic" can refer to the psychological perspective, which approaches human existence through the exploration of values, personal responsibility, spirituality and self-actualization.
The major issues with this approach is the smaller sample size that is required. The tools for measuring the effects against different criteria are developed in advance.
This blog contains papers written by the author on various topics related to psychology. The evaluation does not follow pre-specific design. Curriculum can mean a host of things.
There are natural issues with such a heavy emphasis on numerical data. Formal communication is bound by rules and often associated with professional or academic settings and most business interactions.
In contrast, informal communication generally occurs within intimate interpersonal relationships, that is, interactions with friends and family members.
Scientific vs Humanistic Approach to Curriculum Evaluation Scientific Approach The scientific approach is probably the oldest approach to curriculum evaluation as it dates from modernism and the emphasis on the scientific method of the 19th to 20th century.
The way to really understand other people is to sit down and talk with them, share their experiences and be open to their feelings. The issues and concerns of persons having stake over the project are highlighted and discussed in detail. It could refer to a particular subject such as 7th grade reading, it could refer to a particular grade such as 8th grade in general, it can also refer to an entire school such as elementary or secondary school.
This allows for statistical analysis. For whatever reason, approaches to curriculum evaluation are always explained in extremes. Research on such animals can tell us, so they argued, very little about human thought, behavior and experience.Approaches to Curriculum Evaluation Part I: Scientific vs Humanistic Approach 3 Replies Curriculum evaluation is the process of collecting data in order to make decisions about the curriculum in question.
Scientific And Humanistic Approaches To Evaluation.
the Psychodynamic and Humanistic approaches to understanding personality. People engage in topics of personality on a daily basis. It is how we engage with others, behave.
Scientific vs. Humanistic Approach to Evaluation Presented by: Domineik Greathouse Concordia Univeristy The Humanistic Approach consists of. Dec 10, · The possible reason for the lack of influence on academic psychology can be attributed to the fact that humanistic approaches purposely adopted a non-scientific approach to the study of human behavior and personality (McLeod).
Scientific and Humanistic Evaluations of Follow Through. House, Ernest R. The thesis of this paper is that the humanistic mode of inquiry is underemployed in evaluation studies and the future evaluation of Follow Through could profitably use humanistic approaches.
Understanding and explaining the difference between humanistic and scientific communication is a challenge. While the first has yet to be formally defined, the second encompasses a wide range of subcategories and is even an academic discipline of.Download